Flaws in Greenwich Care charges consultation and Equality Impact Assessment

– No involvement of disabled peoples organisation’s before consultation.

By Anne Novis MBE

-No co-production work.

-No automatic accessible versions in Easy Read sent to clients with learning difficulties. Adult social care knows client’s access needs re communication.

-Many clients did not receive consultation pack.

-No PA’s or BSL Interpreters at forums, no expenses offered so disabled people could attend if needed extra care support, no travel expenses or child care costs offered. Therefore not accessible for all clients to attend.

– No case examples of possible multiple impact’s on one client.

-Extra information given at forums not automatically available for all clients in accessible formats to inform responses to consultation. Also in the funding info you did not outline funding you get from Health service which is significant.

-When stating what other boroughs doing you did not detail those who are not doing what you propose, ie Hammersmith and Fullham.

-Consultation info not sent to all people who could be affected from outset such as Carers, Personal Assistants, Care Agencies, Disabled peoples charities and organisations. An influx of people needing support to appeal charges, redundancies of staff employed as Carers or PA’s due to client’s not being able to afford multiple increased charges.

– No mention of clients who used to get Independent Living Fund.

– Your online consultation is not monitored for anything. Therefore anybody can respond agreeing to proposals, yet not be affected by them. You won’t know how many disabled people in receipt of care responded. Or how many people who are hostile towards disabled people may have used this format to perpetuate hostility, Hate crime, as so many view disabled people in receipt of benefits and services a drain on society and burdens. No monitoring of protected characteristics for EIA.

-No alternative offered instead of what’s proposed.

For example if everyone disagrees with a proposal what will you do? Such alternatives indicate how genuine a consultation is or not.

– There is a principle you should consult with an open mind, so how prepared are you to change your initial thinking? There is nothing that indicates this in your consultation.

– No mention of Government white paper on social care which raises threshold for care charges, whilst been postponed, it indicates that current thresholds are way too low and this information should be included in consultation.

Equality Impact Assessment

-Equality Impact Assessment not easily accessible on confusing website. Many of us tried to find it but could not, no Easy Read version either. Even local councillors could not find it. Found by asking head of social care.

– In first section of EIA you mention a HAS officers benchmarking exercise, in which states ‘some cases Greenwich charge less then other boroughs’. Yet missed out detail of those who also charge less or not at all.

– No mention of other consultations taking place alongside this one that will also impact disabled peoples finances such as Council Tax Discretionary grants removal.

– No mention of multiple impact of several proposals on one client.

For instance one person could be impacted by charges for care, PIP/DLA deduction, Telecare charge increase, admin fee and supported living fee and more.

– No impact identified re charges for supported living and sheltered housing. Yet due to costs this could lead to people needing to move to housing which does not charge, this impacts them and council. Or they may get in debt. As they are disabled people, some elderly, many with learning difficulties, impact and mitigation should be detailed.

– Cap on weekly care costs could mean residential care is cheaper and have detrimental impact on most ill and severely disabled people, losing independence, choice and control.

-Disability Related Expenses is far more then most realise, accessable information is not enough to mitigate impact. Clients will need at least six months to gather evidence of such costs to have fair assessment after being fully and accessibly informed of all costs that can be classed as DRE.

– Telecare service increase charge could cause people to get rid of this life saving service. Impacts those most at risk of falls, ill, disabled or unable to communicate well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: