– No involvement of disabled peoples organisation’s before consultation.
By Anne Novis MBE
-No co-production work.
-No automatic accessible versions in Easy
Read sent to clients with learning difficulties. Adult social care knows client’s
access needs re communication.
-Many clients did not receive consultation
-No PA’s or BSL Interpreters at forums, no
expenses offered so disabled people could attend if needed extra care support,
no travel expenses or child care costs offered. Therefore not accessible for
all clients to attend.
– No case examples of possible multiple
impact’s on one client.
-Extra information given at forums not
automatically available for all clients in accessible formats to inform
responses to consultation. Also in the funding info you did not outline funding
you get from Health service which is significant.
-When stating what other boroughs doing you
did not detail those who are not doing what you propose, ie Hammersmith and Fullham.
-Consultation info not sent to all people who
could be affected from outset such as Carers, Personal Assistants, Care
Agencies, Disabled peoples charities and organisations. An influx of people
needing support to appeal charges, redundancies of staff employed as Carers or
PA’s due to client’s not being able to afford multiple increased charges.
– No mention of clients who used to get Independent
– Your online consultation is not monitored
for anything. Therefore anybody can respond agreeing to proposals, yet not be
affected by them. You won’t know how many disabled people in receipt of care
responded. Or how many people who are hostile towards disabled people may have
used this format to perpetuate hostility, Hate crime, as so many view disabled
people in receipt of benefits and services a drain on society and burdens. No
monitoring of protected characteristics for EIA.
-No alternative offered instead of what’s
For example if everyone disagrees with a
proposal what will you do? Such alternatives indicate how genuine a
consultation is or not.
– There is a principle you should consult with an open mind, so how prepared are you to change your initial thinking? There is nothing that indicates this in your consultation.
– No mention of Government white paper on social care which raises threshold for care charges, whilst been postponed, it indicates that current thresholds are way too low and this information should be included in consultation.
-Equality Impact Assessment not easily
accessible on confusing website. Many of us tried to find it but could not, no
Easy Read version either. Even local councillors could not find it. Found by
asking head of social care.
– In first section of EIA you mention a HAS
officers benchmarking exercise, in which states ‘some cases Greenwich charge
less then other boroughs’. Yet missed out detail of those who also charge less
or not at all.
– No mention of other consultations taking
place alongside this one that will also impact disabled peoples finances such
as Council Tax Discretionary grants removal.
– No mention of multiple impact of several
proposals on one client.
For instance one person could be impacted by
charges for care, PIP/DLA deduction, Telecare charge increase, admin fee and
supported living fee and more.
– No impact identified re charges for
supported living and sheltered housing. Yet due to costs this could lead to
people needing to move to housing which does not charge, this impacts them and
council. Or they may get in debt. As they are disabled people, some elderly,
many with learning difficulties, impact and mitigation should be detailed.
– Cap on weekly care costs could mean
residential care is cheaper and have detrimental impact on most ill and severely
disabled people, losing independence, choice and control.
-Disability Related Expenses is far more then most realise, accessable information is not enough to mitigate impact. Clients will need at least six months to gather evidence of such costs to have fair assessment after being fully and accessibly informed of all costs that can be classed as DRE.
– Telecare service increase charge could
cause people to get rid of this life saving service. Impacts those most at risk
of falls, ill, disabled or unable to communicate well.